Showing posts with label New Jersey. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New Jersey. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 5, 2010

NJ: Restraints used by NJ educators to curb unruly behavior under scrutiny

Excerpt from APP.com:

It's been called "the dirty little secret'' of special education.

New Jersey gives public and private schools a virtual free pass to forcibly restrain unruly children with disabilities.

School employees can use "bear hugs,'' "basket holds'' and "take downs'' … which sound more like wrestling moves than anything you'd expect to see in school … and keep children confined in "time-out'' rooms until they calm down.

Last year, congressional investigators uncovered hundreds of cases of alleged abuse and at least 20 deaths related to the use of restraints and seclusion in U.S. schools since 1990.

State law also allows school employees to use extreme measures to control severely autistic children who habitually injure themselves by banging their heads, biting their hands or other compulsive behaviors. The techniques include spraying water or noxious chemicals in kids' faces, snapping their wrists with rubber bands or putting hot sauce on their tongues, disability rights advocates say.

Educators and crisis-intervention experts say restraining holds and other forceful methods are sometimes necessary, as a last resort, to protect children and others from harm. Moreover, they reflect the serious behavior problems schools have to contend with today, especially in special education.

For more information, please click on the following link: http://www.app.com/article/20100505/SPECIAL20/100504060/1024/POLITICS/Restraints-used-by-NJ-educators-to-curb-unruly-behavior-under-scrutiny

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

NJ: Judge: Denville teacher's rights weren't violated in sex abuse probe

BY PEGGY WRIGHT • DAILY RECORD • NOVEMBER 17, 2009

Police did not violate any constitutional rights of a former Denville teacher -- who is accused of molesting a student -- when they obtained his unlisted cell phone number and had the victim call him.

''I find nothing egregious about the manner in which the phone number was obtained,'' Superior Court Judge John B. Dangler said.

After a near-five-hour hearing today, Dangler rejected defense arguments that police violated a reasonable expectation of privacy that Patrick DeFranco had in regard to keeping his cell phone number confidential.

DeFranco, 43, of Fairport, N.Y., was charged in November 2005 with sexually assaulting a student at the Valley View Middle School in Denville when he was a 13-year-old, 8th grade student in DeFranco's computer class.

To corroborate the victim's claims of a long-ago assault, police asked if he would contact DeFranco while they listened in, or conducted a so-called ''consensual intercept.'' The victim had an outdated number, so the help of a school resource officer -- Denville Officer Jeff Tucker -- was enlisted and he secured DeFranco's phone number from school administrators. The victim called DeFranco and the ex-teacher incriminated himself on tape about a past sexual liaison with the student.

Defense lawyer Edward Byrne argued that law enforcement should have gotten a grand jury subpoena to get the number but instead trampled on DeFranco's privacy right and expectation that the district wouldn't give out his number.

DeFranco also testified today, saying he is very protective of his privacy. But Morris County Assistant Prosecutor Meg Rodriguez noted that he freely disseminated his phone number to students and parents when he was coordinating a school trip abroad and expressed no surprise as to how the victim got his phone number.

Monday, May 11, 2009

NJ: Principal gets probation for abuse

Sentence ends 2003 case involving Bayley Ellard student, teacher

Ending a case that had dragged on for nearly six years, the principal of the defunct Bayley Ellard High School in Madison was sentenced yesterday to four years of probation for inappropriately touching a 17-year-old male student and, in a separate incident, shoving a male teacher and telling him to keep quiet or face reprisals.

Frank Mattiace, 72, of Montville was charged in June 2003 with second-degree crimes and other charges, but pleaded guilty in January to fourth-degree charges of child abuse/neglect and criminal coercion. Unlike second-degree charges, which are punishable by up to 10 years in prison, a fourth-degree charge is punishable by up to 18 months in jail.

Superior Court Judge John Dangler said he spared Mattiace jail time because he has no criminal history, is 72 and suffers from several serious illnesses and likely would respond positively to rehabilitation.

"Mr. Mattiace, you were put in a position of trust. You were looked upon with respect for many years," Dangler said in imposing the sentence.

In entering his plea, Mattiace admitted he hugged the teen and while doing so "touched his buttocks." He also admitted he "shoved or otherwise offensively touched" a teacher.

Mattiace declined to speak during yesterday's hearing in Morristown.

Morris County Assistant Prosecutor Melanie Smith argued for five years of probation and 364 days in the county jail, saying Mattiace took advantage of vulnerable victims.

"He broke the trust he had" with both teacher and student, Smith said. "He was aware of the problems and insecurities they had."

The victims agreed to the plea bargain because they wanted closure, Smith said. She also read letters from the victims, who were not in attendance.

The former student wrote he was a troubled teen who had abused drugs and enrolled at Bayley Ellard to turn his life around. Instead, Mattiace's actions were only the start of his problems, he wrote.

He wrote that he broke down and told his parents about Mattiace, and they called police. "We decided this would not happen to anyone else, because it was the right thing to do (to come forward), and that's when my life turned for the worst," the teen stated in his letter.

Mattiace's arrest rocked the school and its community rallied in support of the principal. The former student wrote he was ostracized and threatened and that he was told by school officials that his safety was at risk if he continued there. As a result, he transferred to another school. He is now pursuing a law degree.

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

NJ: Police shoots a 15 year old mentally disabled kid

February 17, 2009
http://www.policebrutality.info/2009/01/police-abusing-and-shooting-ill-kid.html

A 15-year-old student at Garfield Park, a private school for children with emotional or behavioral disorders, was shot twice after he threatened the police with a pair of scissors. The incident happened in front of the school.

The boy was first threatening some school employees and also some students, before he ran out on the parking lot where he pointed two scissors at a police officer.

He was asked to put his weapon down, and a witness said that she heard how they yelled "put it down, put it down!" before the sound of two gunshots being fired. She said she went out to see what was going on and there she saw the victim lying on his side clutching his stomach.

The officer that shot the boy, William Smith, was not injured.

The shooting will be investigated according to the Burlington County Prosecutor's Office.

The boy was reported in critical but stable condition at Cooper University Hospital, Camden.

Carol Dunn had a similar incident with the police in New Jersey, where her son was shot by an officer outside a church because he refused to let go of the knife he was holding.

"I think police should take every necessary step to save lives. This should be included in their training," she said. "Are they interested in taking lives or is the state of New Jersey interested in saving lives?"

Monday, December 15, 2008

NJ: Parents Allege Child’s Mouth Taped in Heights

by Mark Swanson
December 12, 2008

A Haddon Heights couple presented the town school board with allegations on Tuesday night – the kind that can give any district a black eye. The parents, whose names are withheld to protect their child’s identity, charged that on Wed., Dec. 3, their son had his mouth taped over by a substitute teacher.

On that day, they said, the substitute teacher was in charge of the second grade class. At one point during the school day, the teacher used tape to cover the mouth of their son. The tape was left in place for about 20 minutes.

The parents told the board that their son, who is a classified special education student, has “sensory integration issues,” which are documented in his individual education plan, called an IEP.

Sensory integration disorders generally cause difficulties with processing information from the five senses – vision, auditory, touch, smell and taste – sense of movement and positional sense, called proprioception. The disorder generally causes anxiety and confusion.

With his disorder written into his IEP, the couple says in a letter to the board, they expect that any staff members who would have contact with him would have been trained in sensory integration issues.

“Clearly, the substitute assigned to [his] class on December 2 and 3 was not properly trained to interact with a child with special needs,” they write.
Superintendent Dr. Nancy Hacker declined to comment on the situation.

At the meeting, the boy’s mother said that while administrators contacted her, she got the impression they were trying to sweep the incident under the rug.

Board member Mike Harshaw said that from his experience, some districts require that teachers sign off on IEPs as a way of showing that they are familiar with them. He wondered if anything like that was in place in Heights.

While the district officially has no comment, solicitor Joseph Betley said at the meeting that teachers are not required by the state to sign off on IEPs.

Board President Dr. Phillip Hammer noted that matters regarding staffing are the realm of the superintendent. The board would be welcome to consider the incident and district policy and make their recommendations to Hacker.

According to George Rafferty, the director of special education, IEPs of elementary-level students are on file in the building principals’ offices. They can be reviewed by teachers at any time. Student case managers also review the IEPs with teachers at both the elementary and high school level.

In the past, the parents said, their son was singled out at recess time because teachers did not feel he was dressed appropriately to play outdoors. The parents said that because of his disorder, he often has difficulty wearing long pants. They felt that it was unfair for their child to be secluded or singled out this way.

The parents told the board that what they want is knowledge that the substitute won’t return to their child’s school again. “We need [the board and administrators] to be clear that we will weigh all legal options if the substitute that taped [his] mouth is permitted to substitute in the [school] again,” they say in their letter. “Of course, we are sure that you would not want that quality of substitute to be employed by our school district.”

They further say that they have not authorized and will not consent to any activity that involves physically restraining their child while at school or going to and from school. Special education law requires the use of functional assessments of behavior and the development of positive behavior plans to address such challenges.

The New Jersey Council on Developmental Disabilities’ position, from its website, is that the “use of restraints, seclusion, restrictive equipment and aversive techniques must be carefully defined and closely monitored to prevent misuse of these practices.” The need for such techniques should be minimized, says the council, and “certain restrictive and aversive techniques must be prohibited.”

Nationally, this is not the first time a teacher is alleged to have taped a child’s mouth. In 2005, an Aurora, Colo., taping incident sparked a police investigation and resulted in the teacher’s suspension. In New York this year, a family reportedly sued their school district after their four-year-old daughter was taped for talking during a class “quiet time.”

Friday, November 28, 2008

NJ: Death Of 43-pound Disabled Woman Prompts NJ Probe

Nov 25, 2008 12:45 pm US/Eastern
http://wcbstv.com/local/disabled.adult.death.2.873684.html

CAMDEN, N.J. (AP) ― The state is investigating how a 28-year-old woman died this month after shrinking to 43 pounds while living in a state-run home for developmentally disabled adults.

The Division of Developmental Disabilities caseworker responsible for keeping tabs on the woman has been suspended and state workers are checking on the well-being of all 1,255 residents of similar homes, officials said Tuesday.

The woman, Tara O'Leary, was removed on Sept. 11 from a central New Jersey home where she lived along with two other developmentally disabled adults, according to Tom Fitzsimmons, an aide to state Sen. Jennifer Beck.

The state did not release O'Leary's name, but said she died Nov. 10.

"This death is unacceptable on many levels, and we're doing all we can to scrutinize every aspect and prevent tragedies such as this from occurring again," said Jennifer Velez, the state Human Services commissioner.

The case is similar to one in 2003, when four children -- all weighing less than 45 pounds -- were removed from a state-run foster home in Collingswood. The boys all survived, but their plight brought deep disgrace to the state Division of Human Services and its Division of Children and Family Services.

Pam Ronan, a spokeswoman for the Department of Human Services, said Tuesday the department began investigating O'Leary's care on Sept. 12 -- and the Hunterdon County Prosecutor's Office began a criminal investigation the same day.

Ronan said the woman had a complicated medical history, but that the state could not release many specifics because of state and federal patient privacy laws and because of the investigation.

She said the state is looking into whether the caseworker was making monthly visits to the home.

The state has about 600 licensed community care residences, which operate much like foster homes and serve developmentally disabled adults.

Ronan said the state made public some information about the death and the investigation on Tuesday because officials were aware that three lawmakers, including state Sen. Jennifer Beck, a Republican from Red Bank, had scheduled a news conference with two of O'Leary's cousins and an aunt.

See Related Story: http://tcfpbis.blogspot.com/2008/11/nj-family-alleges-abuse-at-home-for.html

N.J.: Family Alleges Abuse At Home For Disabled After Young Woman's Death

In 3 Years Tara O'Leary Went From Normal Physical Health To Emaciated Beyond Words And Eventual Death
By Sean Hennessey
http://wcbstv.com/topstories/tara.oleary.nj.2.874003.html

LITTLE SILVER, N.J. (CBS) ― A young woman spent her last weeks of life emaciated and with bed sores, and now her family and lawmakers are holding the State of New Jersey responsible for her death.

The developmentally disabled woman was being cared for in a group home overseen by the state.

But as CBS 2 HD found out, the case is now prompting a full review of similar group homes.

When Tara O'Leary was 26 she was developmentally disabled but healthy. But when she died three years later, she was hospitalized, just 48 pounds and in unspeakable pain.

"It was horrible," said Maureen Faletti, O'Leary's cousin. "It was something we'll never forget. It was heartbreaking, traumatizing."

On Tuesday her cousins and state lawmakers blamed New Jersey's Department of Developmental Disabilities for her death.

"Clearly there was abuse happening, horrific abuse happening," State Sen. Jennifer Beck, R-12th District, said.

The problems began when the woman's father died in 2005 and her stepmother took over as guardian. The problem was, she wasn't a legal guardian, yet was allowed to act like one, denying the family access to O'Leary, or letting them know the location of the group home where she was being cared for.

"We couldn't, obviously, go to the home, so there was no way of us to make sure Tara was fine except for the case worker's word," cousin Eileen Devlin said.

The family said O'Leary's case worker told them all the right things.

"'Oh, Tara's needs are being met fully. She couldn't be in a more loving environment. This family loves her and cares for her as she was her own,'" Faletti said.

But inside the home, O'Leary was withering away, and was finally rushed to the hospital where things went from bad to worse.

"She was pulling her hair out of her head," Faletti said. "She was pulling her fingers and her mouth, screaming in pain."

The 29-year-old died on Nov. 10.

"Tara could have lived to be an old woman," Faletti said.

Now lawmakers are sending letters to the attorney general, demanding an investigation.

With more than 1,200 developmentally disabled adults in New Jersey, lawmakers want to know who's caring for them, and if they are okay.

"It's so frightening to think what's going on in these homes with these people who don't have voices for themselves," Assemblywoman Caroline Casagrande, R-12th District, said.

O'Leary's case worker didn't want to talk and there was no answer at the group home, but now answers are being demanded so this never happens again.

The case worker has been suspended and the group home has been shut down.

CBS 2 HD contacted New Jersey's Department of Developmental Disabilities to find out how this could have happened but they haven't gotten back to us.

See Related Story: http://tcfpbis.blogspot.com/2008/11/nj-death-of-43-pound-disabled-woman.html

Sunday, September 14, 2008

Dozens of school bus drivers with criminal convictions transport

Dozens of school bus drivers with criminal convictions transport children to class each day, many with the state's approval, a Gannett New Jersey investigation has found.

Offenses for the persons convicted range from manslaughter to drug distribution to theft.

Of the 35 drivers found by Gannett New Jersey, three have had their bus driving endorsements revoked by the state Department of Education after the Press forwarded its list to authorities.

None of the banned drivers worked in Middlesex, Monmouth or Ocean counties.

The three drivers include a man convicted of manslaughter and two women convicted of endangering the welfare of a child.

The gap in background checks for school bus employees is so wide that one man with two prior drug convictions was hired as a bus aide by a Keansburg company to transport Middletown students. State officials said they were never told about the hire, and, as a result, no background check was ever run.

The aide, Parrish L. Jones, is now serving a 10-year prison term for giving a near-fatal dose of methadone to a 15-year-old on a school bus in 2006.

Of the 32 remaining bus drivers whose permits were not terminated because of prior convictions, state officials said none had offenses that would warrant taking them off school buses. The convictions included simple assault, gambling, weapons possession and official misconduct, according to a review of state court records.

Still, state education officials said that those with serious offenses shouldn't have escaped detection and that measures are being taken to close the loopholes that let Jones and others get on a school bus.

"The safety and security of our children are DOE's highest priorities, which is why we do these background checks in the first place," said Kathryn Forsyth, Department of Education spokeswoman. "It is simply unacceptable to us to have anyone slip
through the cracks, and when we find that someone has, we move quickly to make sure they are disqualified and fired."

Gannett New Jersey also found that 148 convicts received school bus driver licenses after their convictions, but that their permits have since expired, according to a review of bus drivers and state criminal court records for the last 15 years.

The drivers worked for both private bus companies and school districts that operated their own bus service.

State education officials, who are required by law to keep certain criminals from driving school children, said that the three terminated bus drivers fell through the cracks because of changes in the state's fingerprinting system.

"In these instances, we are obligated to take action," said Carl Carabelli, manager of the criminal history review unit for the education department. "Disqualification notices went out on Aug. 21, which said they are disqualified (from school employment) and should be terminated, and we sent notices to MVC (Motor Vehicle Commission) to revoke their school bus endorsement."

School bus drivers are supposed to be fingerprinted and go through criminal background checks every two years, when they renew their bus driver's license. But those safeguards, designed to reassure parents, don't always work, said Dr. Alan Ross, founder of the National Coalition for School Bus Safety, Connecticut.

Federal law prohibits individuals from driving a school bus who have been convicted of first- or second-degree crimes, such as murder and aggravated assault, and some third-degree theft offenses.

Middletown school bus aide Jones is a recent example of how a slip-up can cause a near death. Jones had two prior drug convictions in Monmouth County, but got a job as an aide for the Aberdeen-based Milu Bus Service.

Jones, 37, of Keansburg, was convicted of drug distribution in Monmouth County in 1992 and again in 1996. He was given a 364-day jail term in 1992 and a three-year prison sentence in 1996, according to public records.

Jones pleaded guilty to giving methadone a synthetic narcotic to a 15-year-old Middletown North High School student in October 2006. The boy nearly died from the overdose. Jones was sentenced last June to five to 10 years in prison.

Jones was hired for school employment despite his two prior drug convictions because his name was never submitted for a background check to the state by the bus company, Forsyth said. An education department audit revealed that the company also failed to submit other employees' names for background checks, she said.

"His name didn't go through the system. They were cited for noncompliance. They have to perform a corrective action plan," she said.

Education officials are putting together administrative procedures to fine any bus company that fails to submit workers names for background checks, Forsyth said.

"It is a shame that what happened in Middletown happened. I thank God the child was okay, it's one heck of an awakening for the township," said Maria Wheaton, parent of a student who graduated from Middletown North High School last year.

While Wheaton said she was satisfied with how the district handled the situation, she said she supports a bill introduced by state Sens. Loretta Weinberg, D-Bergen, Barbara Buono, D-Middlesex, and Shirley Turner, D-Mercer.

The bill would require more frequent fingerprinting of all school employees and mandate that those fingerprints are kept on file. In June, it was approved by the Senate education committee and is waiting to be posted for a vote by the full Senate.

"That bill is a great idea, it should pass with flying colors," Wheaton said. "I think that any adult who works with school age children should definitely go through a thorough background check."

The three school bus drivers state officials said were disqualified are:

Cora Outlaw, 42, Newark, convicted of endangering the welfare of a child and sentenced to three years in prison in 1992. She was last approved for school employment in May 2007 in Essex County.

State education department officials said they initially found no disqualifying crimes on her record. Her endangerment conviction has since been verified, disqualifying her from driving a school bus.

Marba L. Morris, 50, Teaneck, was convicted of endangering the welfare of a child and placed on two years' probation 1999. She was last approved for school employment in 2005 in Bergen County.

Bobby G. Allen, 54, of Vineland, convicted of manslaughter in 1992, was sentenced to 270 days in jail and four years' probation. He was approved for school employment in August 2006 in Vineland. Education department officials said the conviction wasn't on his record. After a new review of records, he was disqualified from school employment.

None of the drivers could be reached for comment.

The drivers can challenge the action by filing an administrative appeal with the department within 30 days, said Carabelli, of the education department's enforcement bureau. None has filed an appeal as of Thursday, Sept. 11.

How did those three drivers and others make it through the system?

In several cases, individuals uncovered by Gannett New Jersey slipped through the criminal background safety net because their fingerprints weren't kept on file by the state Bureau of Identification, Carabelli said.

In 12 other cases reviewed, the crimes weren't considered by the department to be disqualifying offense at the time they were convicted, Carabelli said.

All first- and second-degree offenses, such as homicides and major drug crimes, are disqualifying. A theft charge depends on the severity and the value of what was taken, Carabelli said. Some third-degree theft offenses also are considered disqualifying offenses, he said.

State officials determined that 10 drivers on the Gannett New Jersey's list would keep their license because the offenses they were convicted of weren't disqualifying under the law. They included weapons possession, interfering with custody of a child and witness tampering.

Four drivers on the list were convicted of lower offenses, such as disorderly persons and drug possession, which were not considered a disqualification at that time of arrest. But such offenses would bar them from obtaining a school bus driver's license now, Carabelli said.

The state criminal history review unit handles 70,000 background checks a year for all school employees and disqualifies an average of about 1 percent, Carabelli said. There are 25,000 school bus drivers authorized to drive students in the state, he said.

One problem identifying drivers with records is that until February 2003, the state Bureau of Identification didn't retain the physical fingerprints from background checks, said Forsyth, the spokeswoman for the education department.

"If they committed a crime, we didn't know unless we found out anecdotally or through the newspapers or if the police or prosecutor let us know a crime was committed," Forsyth said.

That database is "much more complete" and state education officials will know immediately if a bus driver or school employee is convicted or has a record, she said.

Legislation in the state Senate would require all school employees and applicants to undergo fingerprinting and criminal background checks every two years.

The bill, S110, also would require the education department and state Department of Labor and Workforce Development, which tracks individual wage data, to compare databases to determine if a school employee has not undergone a criminal background check, or has been disqualified yet still works with students.

"The (education) department not only strongly supports this bill, we helped write it," Forsyth said. "As the people who administer the system, we knew where the problems were and what had to be addressed legislatively. We think this bill will significantly tighten the safety net."

"It expands our ability to make sure people don't fall through the cracks," Forsyth said. "All these pieces are filling holes."