Showing posts with label Corporal Punishment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Corporal Punishment. Show all posts

Monday, October 11, 2010

KY: School systems review corporal punishment policy

Published: Monday, October 11, 2010 at 5:00 a.m.
Last Modified: Sunday, October 10, 2010 at 6:49 p.m.

Two school boards revised a disciplinary policy this week regarding corporal punishment.

The Davidson County and Thomasville City school systems upgraded their “School Plan for Management of Student Behavior” to bring it into compliance with N.C. House Bill 1682, which legislators recently passed and will be effective this school year.

Lexington City Schools prohibits corporal punishment for all students, with the policy stating other consequences are more appropriate and effective for teaching self-control.

The revision for the county and Thomasville touches on administering corporal punishment to students who are classified as having a disability. It states the punishment may not be given to disabled students whose parents or guardians have not given permission. Parents are given a permission form at the start of the school year.

“There have to be very special precautions before any kind of corporal punishment is to be administered,” said Dr. Fred Mock, superintendent of Davidson County Schools. “We took a look at the entire corporal punishment policy. We do not prohibit it.”

Thomasville City Schools went a step above the state policy and added a section in which corporal punishment will only take place if a parent signs a statement giving permission to the administrator and the parent or guardian has to be present.

To read the full article, please click on the following link: http://www.the-dispatch.com/article/20101011/ARTICLES/101019995/1005

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

India: Partha De "Determined to Stop the Menace of Corporal Punishment at Any Cost" with New Complaint System

July 28, 2010


Corporal Punishment


(The Telegraph) Students and parents can soon complain about corporal punishment directly to the state government through SMS and email under a separate set of rules meant to ensure that teachers spare the rod.


“We are determined to stop the menace of corporal punishment at any cost. No teacher will be allowed to inflict physical and mental torture on students,” declared school education minister Partha De following a series of meetings through the day to finalise the draft of the proposed rules.


The rules, including “direct government intervention” based on complaints filed by guardians and students with the authorities, will be binding on all schools affiliated to the state board.



************
“There can be no excuse for beating up a student. When a teacher is appointed, he/she needs to make a declaration not to impose any kind of physical or mental torture on students. The new set of rules aims to ensure that under no circumstance can a teacher break that oath,” said De.





Tuesday, May 4, 2010

FL: School Discipline Has Changed

Excerpt from Ocala.com:

Published: Tuesday, May 4, 2010 at 6:30 a.m.
Last Modified: Tuesday, May 4, 2010 at 7:08 a.m.

Three weeks ago, the Marion County School Board banned paddling from its menu of disciplinary measures in a move applauded by many educators, parents and disciplinary experts who say corporal punishment is less effective than methods that don't rely on force and intimidation.

They note that since the 1960s, educators enjoy a wider array of disciplinary tools tailored to address different kinds of student misconduct, including in-school suspension, alternative schools and deans of discipline.

But critics of the School Board's decision to abolish paddling say public school educators face more serious behavioral problems than ever before, and their ability to deal assertively with those problems has eroded over time.


For more information, please click on the following link: http://www.ocala.com/article/20100504/ARTICLES/5041008/1005/sports01?Title=School-discipline-has-changed

Tuesday, February 16, 2010

AL: Teacher Accused of Spanking Despite School Procedures

By Jennifer Searcy
Founder/Director of Public Policy & Affairs

February 16, 2010

A teacher stands accused of spanking a child, despite "no spanking" documentation on file for the child.

Shonna Beckwith, a physical education teacher at Weedon Elementary School in Florence, Alabama, allegedly spanked a child against the school's procedure on corporal punishment earlier in the month.

The city's school board is expected to render a decision in the case today, during their regularly scheduled meeting.

No further details are available at this time.




Monday, February 8, 2010

MO: HB 1543 - Corporal Punishment and the Use of Force

February 8, 2010

By: Jennifer Searcy
Founder/Director of Public Policy & Affairs

HB 1543, a new bill on corporal punishment and the use of force, has been introduced into (and is quickly moving through) the Missouri House of Representatives.

Ange Hemmer, our colleague from Missouri Families Against Restraint and Seclusion, has written a blog post which explains her concerns with HB 1543. While we are analyzing this bill more fully, we wanted to share Ange's concerns with this bill with our readers - concerns which we also share. Here's an excerpt from her most recent post:
HB 1543, an omnibus bill dealing in part to improve school safety, is currently moving its way through the Missouri House of Representatives. It is my understanding that this bill, which looks a lot like HB 96 from last year, was discussed in the Education Committee last Wednesday.

Among the amendments adopted was one that bans corporal punishment of special education (IEP) students. This is great news for those who have been identified as special educated students, but is Missouri going to continue to fight to keep corporal punishment legal in Missouri schools?

Besides that issue, there is the continuing problem where school districts are left to conduct their own investigations if there are abuse allegations after spanking or use of force to protect persons or property. Children's services would not be allowed to conduct an investigation unless the school district finds itself liable for abuse.

As in last year's bill, "use of force" and "property destruction" are not defined, and since Missouri does not ban prone restraint (or other harmful methods of "force"), a child can legally be held face down for property destruction as minor as ripping up paper. In other words, what is happening currently to this child will continue to be LEGAL.

We detailed our concerns about HB 96 in this post from January 31, 2009:
http://tcfpbis.blogspot.com/2009/01/action-alert-mo-house-bill-96-school.html

Please read the new bill and form your own opinions. And if you have any questions or concerns, please consider taking the following actions:

Consider emailing us at tcfpbis@gmail.com with HB 1543 in the subject line to discuss this further.

Contact the Missouri House Special Standing Committee on Children and Families :
http://house.mo.gov/content.aspx?info=/bills101/commit/com488.htm and
Elementary and Secondary Education Committee: http://house.mo.gov/content.aspx?info=/bills101/commit/com455.htm

And the Missouri Senate
Education Committee: http://www.senate.mo.gov/10info/comm/educ.htm and theJoint Committee on Education: http://www.senate.mo.gov/10info/comm/statutory/jced.htm

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

India: Teacher sent to 3-month jail for beating student

Excerpt from The Times of India

TNN, 3 February 2010, 06:55am IST


AHMEDABAD: To set an example in order to curb corporal punishment in schools, a city court on Tuesday punished a teacher and sentenced him three-month imprisonment for beating a student. The court has also awarded compensation of Rs 5,000 to the student.

[The teacher, Ranjitsingh] Yadav teaches Hindi language at Rashtriya Bharti Hindi School located at the CTM in Amraiwadi and went to standard IX on February 20, 2002 to [seek] books from students [and] to check home work assigned to them. A student named Mukesh Kushwaha, who had forgotten to bring the book to school that day, could not satisfy the teacher's queries.

Angry with the student, the teacher twisted Kushwaha's left arm and caused a fracture. The student was then rushed to the hospital for treatment, but his parents lodged a complaint with the Amraiwadi police station.

Sunday, January 10, 2010

US study says smacking kids helps them

Excerpt from Digital Journal.com

Smacking leads to happier kids, according to a new US study. Ironically, it took this long to find enough people who hadn’t been smacked to do the study. Now, a US study says that smacking into adolescence actually helps.

January 3, 2010

Prof. Marjorie Gunnoe, of Calvin University, Grand Rapids, Michigan, did a study of 2600 people, including about 25% who’d never received physical chastisement. The press coverage of this is sparse, and it looks like there’s a paper in the works, which has reduced the output in the releases, but Prof. Gunnoe has stated that the data from her study simply doesn’t support the no-smack concept.
Her research states that children smacked up to the age of six were likely to do better, in fact, at school, and more likely to do volunteer work, want go to university, and other signs of higher participatory involvements.
Gunnoe isn’t saying smacking is an answer. She considers it a “dangerous tool”, which may indicate she started her research with more than a few reservations of her own. She also said that it’s not appropriate for all situations.

To read the full article, please click the following link: http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/284967

Monday, December 14, 2009

FL: Glynn school board to consider bringing back corporal punishment

Some want corporal punishment to come back to Glynn schools.


BRUNSWICK - When the Glynn County school board's Safety and Discipline Committee meets Tuesday to discuss issuing Tasers to school police officers, it will also consider reinstating a form of discipline that could be even more controversial: corporal punishment.

Board member and committee chairman John Madala believes paddling is an effective tool needed to enforce student discipline. He placed the issue on the committee's Tuesday agenda.

Corporal punishment has not been used in Glynn schools in more than four years. The school board voted unanimously July 12, 2005, to remove it as a student discipline option.

At the time, school systems nationwide were banning paddling amid concern about potential lawsuits from parents and questions about its effectiveness in improving student behavior.

Madala, whose wife is a teacher, advocates bringing paddling back in at least the elementary and middle schools where its use potentially will be most effective.

"We've got to equip the teachers with the tools they need to maintain structure and control in their classrooms," he said. "Corporal punishment would be another tool in the box to control unruly students."

Unless unruly students are brought under control, they will continue to disrupt the classroom, resulting in the other pupils missing out on educationalopportunities, he said.

teresa.stepzinski@jacksonville. com, (912) 264-0405

Friday, December 11, 2009

TN: Coaches' Paddlings of High School Basketball Player Upheld

A federal appeals court today upheld frequent paddlings of a high school basketball player in Memphis by his coaches over missed practices, tardiness, poor grades, and even, allegedly, for missed shots during basketball games.

Noting that Tennessee law permits corporal punishment by teachers "for good cause in order to maintain discipline and order within the public schools," a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit, in Cincinnati, ruled unanimously that "a reasonable juror could conclude that the paddlings administered by [the two coaches] were for disciplinary purposes, and were not 'excessive' in severity, frequency, motivation, or means."

The case brought by Martin Nolan, a student at Hamilton High School in Memphis from 2001 to 2004, against the two basketball coaches, school administrators, and the Memphis district alleged that the paddlings violated his 14th Amendment right to substantive due process of law.

At trial, the coaches denied paddling Nolan for missing shots, saying he may have been paddled for demonstrating poor technique on the court. But they acknowledged paddling him for disciplinary reasons and, on a few occasions, for poor grades. The district's then-superintendent testified that she believed one of the coaches paddled basketball players for missing shots and that she suspended him from coaching as a result.

The coaches said they did not use much force in paddling Nolan, and the defendants presented evidence that the student did not suffer any serious injuries. The jury ruled for the defendants on all claims.

In its ruling in Nolan v. Memphis City Schools, the 6th Circuit panel said the paddlings "did not amount to a brutal and inhumane abuse of official power that shocks the conscience."

"The Nolans contend that paddling a high school student for a nondisciplinary reason cannot be tolerated in a civilized society," the court said. "The jury, however, was entitled to draw a different conclusion."

Saturday, December 5, 2009

AL: Birmingham Student Says Beaten In Class

12/03/09 5:27 pm | reporter: Yenu Wodajo producer: Jeff Wyatt

Click link for video: http://www.abc3340.com/news/stories/1209/684019.html

Birmingham, AL - A Birmingham child was allegedly beaten for giving the wrong answers on a test.

Sarah Blackmon claims the teacher used a belt on her son after he missed six questions. The beating reportedly broke the skin.


His mother says her son Tony is traumatized by what happened and she is livid. Her son's disability is learning, not behavioral. She says if she had hit her own child, someone would have reported her to the Department of Human Resources so it is unacceptable for a teacher to ever do so.

"He's in special ed because he needs the help and she did this in front of the class and she humiliated him," said Blackmon.

She says 9 year-old Tony can not get past the beating his teacher gave him. She points to a scar on his leg that shows the remnant of a wound now a month old.

"That Monday morning when he got ready to go to school he was hysterical," Blackmon said.

That is when she knew something was wrong. When Tony told her about the alleged beating, she called the Barrett Elementary School teacher herself.

"She said 'he took the test, he brought it up to be graded, he got six answers wrong and I took my belt off and I hit him.'"

Now, Blackmon has filed a formal complaint with Birmingham City Schools. Her attorney Kira Fonteneau says, while corporal punishment is legal in Alabama, what happened violates the school system's policy as well as federal law.

"We believe that hitting him in that way because he failed to perform was in fact hitting him because he was disabled," said Fonteneau.

Blackmon had Tony moved into another class and says she has concerns about her son's long term response to the incident.

Fonteneau says she is prepared to file suit if the school system does not ameliorate the situation and make major changes to its policy.

"If in fact a teacher is allowed to hit a child for no real reason at all, what type of screening did we go through in hiring this teacher," Fonteneau said.

The Birmingham School System declined a request for an interview. However, its spokesperson Michaelle Chapman did provide a written statement saying the second grade teacher admitted to spanking a student with a belt. She is on unpaid administrative leave.

The statement says, "the assistant superintendent who supervises Barrett has attempted several times to meet with the mother but has been unsuccessful in setting an appointment time with her."

Chapman says the school system has not made a decision about the teacher's long-term future or any further action.

Saturday, November 21, 2009

ACTION ALERT: Indiana Star Seeking Parent Input on Corporal Punishment

Should schools still use the paddle?
http://www.indystar.com/article/20091119/PROMO/91119015/Should-schools-still-use-the-paddle

The Indianapolis Star is working on a story about the increasing number of Central Indiana school districts banning corporal punishment as a form of discipline. We want to hear what you think.

Most districts in central Indiana counties specifically bar teachers and administrators from striking children. And of those that still do allow it, one is poised to change that policy and administrators in most of the others don't paddle children even when allowed to.

The federal government estimates that 577 Indiana children were paddled in schools during the 2006-2007 school year, the last year for which data were available.

Advocates of paddling say that it is an effective way to get a disruptive child's attention. Opponents say that it teaches violence and is not appropriate for educators to be involved in.

Parents, what do you think? Send your e-mail to andy.gammill@indystar.com. Let us know your thoughts to use in our news story. Be sure to give your name and phone number so we can contact you. We will use the phone number only for having a reporter contact you.

TN: Spanking guidelines modified

Friday, November 20, 2009
http://www.t-g.com/story/1588852.html

Bedford County Board of Education revised its corporal punishment policy Thursday night due to statewide concerns that corporal punishment is not equally applied to male and female students.

The change is being made by multiple school systems in response to complaints about the practice from the American Civil Liberties Union, said School Superintendent Ed Gray.

Many systems in Tennessee, including Bedford County, use model school system policies supplied by the Tennessee School Boards Association. Not every school system uses corporal punishment, but those who do, and who are using the model TSBA policy, have been using this guideline:

"6. In determining the use and degree of corporal punishment, consideration will be given to the age, sex, size, physical and emotional condition of the child."

Gray said that there have been complaints by ACLU at the state level that corporal punishment is not equally applied to boys and girls, which would be a violation of Title IX educational requirements. For this reason, the state sent out a memo to local school systems using corporal punishment asking them to strike guideline 6 entirely from their policies.

The memo says that the state has negotiated with the U.S. Department of Education to make the change, and if all of the affected school systems remove the item by Jan. 15, 2010, the federal Department of Education will close its complaint against the state.

The remaining provisions, which are still in effect, include requiring that corporal punishment be administered "only after less stringent measures have failed, or if the conduct of a student is of such nature that corporal punishment is the only reasonable form of punishment under the circumstances." Corporal punishment must be administered in the presence of a second professional employee, using an instrument approved by the school's principal. The punishment must be "reasonable" and "in proportion to the gravity of the offense, the apparent motive and disposition of the offender, and the influence of the offender's example and conduct on others."

In other discussion Thursday night:

* Board members welcomed their newest colleague, Chad Graham, who was appointed last week by Bedford County Board of Commissioners to fill the unexpired term of the late Jerry Naron. Graham is director of Bedford County Emergency Medical Services.

* County finance director Robert Daniel said the school system's finances are tight, but not in crisis, due to the economic slowdown and its effect on tax revenues.

"It is manageable at this time, but if it continues on this trend it may not be manageable," said Daniel.

Gray said the real crisis point for the school system may be the 2011-2012 fiscal year, when some of the stimulus funding being received by the state will run out and the state is likely to cut some of its assistance for local school systems.

"2011-2012 may be our worst nightmare," said Gray, especially if the next governor is not as dedicated to preserving Basic Education Program funding as Gov. Phil Bredesen has been.

The board passed a routine budget amendment accounting for various grant funds and adjusting the revenue figures slightly to comply with the state's maintenance of effort requirements

* The board approved bids for school buses, vehicle parts, batteries, oil and lubricants and roofing repair.

Three 66-passenger school buses will be replaced at Liberty School, at a cost of $70,709 each, and a new 90-passenger bus will be added to the county's fleet at a cost of $80,704. Two special education buses will be purchased with federal stimulus funds at a cost of $83,121 each. The special education buses are as expensive as much larger school buses because of the special equipment they include, such as wheelchair lifts and seat belts.

* School board members reported on various seminars and breakout sessions from the recent Tennessee School Boards Association convention.


Sunday, November 15, 2009

IN: Teacher accused of hitting student will avoid trial

By Vic Ryckaert

November 14, 2009

http://www.theautismnews.com/2009/11/14/teacher-accused-of-hitting-student-will-avoid-trial/

A former Perry Township teacher has surrendered his teaching license to avoid trial on allegations that he struck a disabled student in 2008.

Thomas Cripe, 65, will not be allowed to teach in Indiana or other states under a diversion agreement filed Friday in Marion Superior Court.

“It turned out to be a good outcome for everyone,” said his attorney, John Kautzman. “The state and the victim’s mother didn’t want him to teach anymore, and our client was enjoying his retirement.”

If Cripe does not get arrested in the next two years, prosecutors will dismiss two charges of battery that alleged Cripe twice struck Brent Mobley, then 20, in August 2008 at RISE Learning Center, 5391 Shelby St.

Mario Massillamany, a spokesman for County Prosecutor Carl Brizzi, said the key goal was ensuring that Cripe never returns to a classroom. “The victims, their biggest concern was that he never teaches again, and that he admits guilt.”

Mobley has autism and severe mental retardation. Cripe’s attorneys, Kautzman and Andrew Duncan, said Mobley was unruly and struck the teacher first.

In each instance, defense attorneys said, Cripe struck Mobley across the face after verbal commands failed. Cripe, a teacher for 17 years, retired after the incidents.

Kautzman said he believed Cripe would have won an acquittal had the trial continued. State law, he said, gives teachers the right to use a reasonable amount of corporal punishment to maintain order.

TX: 7 yr old boy bruised by paddle at school; taken to emergency room


The Daily Sentinel

Saturday, November 14, 2009

http://www.dailysentinel.com/hp/content/news/stories/2009/11/14/augustine_paddling_111409.html?imw=Y

A San Augustine woman said she is concerned about the paddling of her 7-year-old son at his elementary school that left him with bruises on his buttocks and tailbone so severe she had to take him to the local emergency room.

Lynita Lamar told The Daily Sentinel that on Friday, Nov. 6, the principal of the San Augustine Elementary School paddled her second grader three times for having a calculator in his possession that another child had allegedly taken the previous day from the high school campus. Lamar alleges that the paddle used is one inch thick, wrapped in surgical tape and has electric lights on it that are plugged into a wall socket and meant to "intimidate children."

Lamar said she was not notified by school officials that her son had received corporal punishment, and she only discovered the paddle marks when she gave the boy his nightly bath. In previous years, Lamar said the school sent home letters allowing parents to opt out of the practice of corporal punishment. But this year, the school district did not send those letters home, she said.

Now she said she wants the school's policy reversed.

"If he had done something wrong, I think they should have contacted me, and we could have gone from there," Lamar said. "But I don't believe they have the right to whip your child so extremely that it leaves bruises on him for a week and bruises his tailbone, too.

"Now I just want to do whatever I can to change the law," she said, adding that she wanted the school board to implement a 'no-hands-on' policy, especially for the younger students. "I don't believe any 6, 7 or 8-year-old should be coming home black and blue like that."

Lamar said she will take her fight to the governor's office if she has too, and she is looking into contacting advocacy groups that oppose corporal punishment and might provide her with legal counsel to assist her in obtaining reimbursement for her hospital bill.

According to the Texas Education Agency, which does not track corporal punishment statistics, during the last legislative session, two bills that would have mandated parent consent on corporal punishment never passed. So as it stands, current state law allows for teachers and principals to issue corporal punishment as they see fit, as long as it does not cause death. And employees of public school districts are immune from prosecution for corporal punishment as long as it is not deemed "excessive" or results in bodily injury, which is exactly what Lamar says happened in her son's case.

Photographs of her son Lamar said were taken the day after the paddling show numerous black, blue and purple bruises across the child's buttocks. After taking the boy to the emergency room the next day, doctors prescribed regular Tylenol for the pain, which she said prevented the boy from resting on his backside all weekend, and a heating pad to reduce the swelling.

San Augustine ISD Superintendant Walter Key said that it was never the intention of the principal to cause any injury to the child. He said that in this case, corporal punishment was appropriate for the student's infraction, which he said he could not elaborate on because of privacy issues.

"Spanking is never meant to harm or cause injury to a child," Key said. "That's not what spanking is for, nor is any other punishment.

"The bruising I saw in the photos — I certainly didn't see the child before the bruising — but it appears the paddling did cause the bruising, but that's not what it was for," he said.

Key added that without knowing the child's medical history, it was impossible to say whether or not the same paddling would have caused similar injuries to another child.

"Some children can call fall, and they're going to bruise badly, and there's some that won't bruise whatsoever," he said.

Addressing one of Lamar's main concerns that the elementary school no longer gave parents the option of exempting their child from corporal punishment, Key said that policy was recently revised by the school board.

"The district allows for corporal punishment if that is the best form of punishment that fits the nature of the offense," Key said. "In years past, the elementary campus allowed the parents to give permission, or not, for corporal punishment. The school board found out about that and made it very clear that to the elementary school and all campuses, that was not allowable ... that if corporal punishment was the best punishment that fit the offense, than that's what had to happen."

Lamar said while she does not totally object to the idea of corporal punishment being used in schools, she is adamant that parents have the right to know whether or not their child is being physically punished and the right to not allow it to be used on their child if they wish.

"I just want the law to say that they can't be beating on my baby," she said. "I'm scared because I don't know if it will happen again. They're telling me it can without me even knowing about it. That's why I want this changed."

Texas is one of 20 states that still allow corporal punishment in schools and has historically utilized the disciplinary technique more than any other state partly due to the state's large student population.

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

TN: School board changes paddling policy

Mary Jo Denton
Herald-Citizen Staff
Monday, Nov 09, 2009

COOKEVILLE -- From now on, Putnam school principals who discipline students by paddling must not make any difference between boys and girls. That and other considerations -- age, size, physical and emotional condition of the student -- were removed from official school policy last week by vote of the Putnam school board, acting on a recommendation from the Tennessee Dept. of Education and the Tennessee School Boards Association.

The board's action removes this sentence from official school board policy on corporal punishment: "In determining the use and degree of corporal punishment, consideration will be given to the age, sex, physical and emotional condition of the child." Why did the education officials recommend doing away with that provision in the corporal punishment policy? Because of a grievance filed by Tennesseans for Non-Violent School Discipline. That group filed the grievance against Putnam and several other school systems which still had the gender consideration in their paddling policies.

To comment on this story, click this link to go to our Facebook page.

The grievance was filed with the Office of Civil Rights, based on the Title IX federal law which requires gender equity for students in education programs that receive federal funding. Including gender as a consideration in whether to paddle and how hard to paddle amounts to gender discrimination, the group argues.

Reportedly, Putnam County was among 68 Tennessee school systems cited in the group's complaint. After last Thursday's school board meeting in which the considerations clause of the corporal punishment policy was deleted, the Herald-Citizen asked Director of Schools Kathleen Airhart about the use of corporal punishment in the county's schools. "It's pretty infrequent here," she said. "Only a handful of our schools still use it. Most resort to other means in disciplinary matters." She said paddling is still used at Cornerstone Middle School, White Plains Academy, and Cane Creek Elementary.

She said the current policy allows parents to opt out of school paddling of their children. "But some parents tell us they want their children paddled if necessary." The official board policy says this: "Any principal or assistant principal may use corporal punishment in a reasonable manner against any student for good cause in order to maintain discipline and order within the public schools in accordance with guidelines."

The guidelines are as follows:
* Corporal punishment shall be administered only after other less stringent measures have failed, or if the conduct of the student is of such nature that corporal punishment is the only reasonable form of punishment under the circumstances.
* The instrument to be used in administering corporal punishment shall be approved by the principal.
* Corporal punishment shall be reasonable.
* Corporal punishment shall be administered in the presence of another professional employee.
* The nature of the punishment will be such that it is in proportion to the gravity of the offense, the apparent motive and disposition of the offender, and the influence of the offender's example and conduct on others.

The policy also requires that a detailed record of the incident and the punishment be made.

Monday, November 9, 2009

MS: 3 on Your Side Investigation - Corporal punishment

By Cheryl Lasseter - bio | email

Posted: Nov 05, 2009 6:18 PM ESTUpdated: Nov 06, 2009 3:22 AM EST

http://www.wlbt.com/Global/story.asp?S=11453537#

JACKSON, MS (WLBT) - Earlier this year, an 11-year-old student in Greenwood, Mississippi sued the LeFlore County School District after suffering deep bruising, and possible kidney damage, from a severe paddling at school.

Corporal punishment happens every day in our state. In fact, during the 2007 school year, Mississippi doled out 38,151 school spankings. We're number two in the country, just behind Texas, which charted more than 49,000.

Mississippi's American Civil Liberties Union opposes corporal punishment because there's no scientific data proving it works. State ACLU President Nsombi Lambright reminds parents they can sign a waiver prohibiting a school from paddling their child. But parents still need to be careful.

"We get calls from parents who have signed the waiver and their kids still get beaten inside these schools. They ask us to provide legal representation for them," Lambright says. "But it's difficult because in these communities, the Department of Human Services will not investigate these cases, nor will the local police department. We also get those calls where... the child has been hurt so badly they attempted to stop the paddling, put their hand behind them, their wrist was fractured. A few years ago we got a call about a student hit in the head with a paddle," she says.

Were you paddled in your school days? How did it make you feel? 26-year-old Alanna Windham attended Enterprise School, a K-12 school in Lincoln County. She was paddled for a minor infraction when she was a high school senior.

"It hurt, it stung but that stopped me from misbehaving," she says. "I told my dad, he told me I deserved it, so if that's the punishment they chose, that's the punishment they chose."

A supporter of corporal punishment in schools, Windham plans to allow her daughter Laura to be spanked at school if the punishment fits the deed.

But some school districts believe spanking is not essential. Jackson Public Schools set the rod aside in the early 1990's. Soon, they will roll out a program called PBIS (Positive Behavior Intervention and Support). It's an entire change of the school climate.

PBIS has already been used for six years at Poindexter Elementary. Appropriate behavior is taught in the classroom, everything from sitting quietly to walking in a line.

School counselor Leona Bishop says bad behavior is dealt with through a series of five steps. Referral to the principal's office is the 5th step.

"For students who are constantly referred, 2-3 referrals, they're moved to a tier 3," Bishop says. "We try to provide counseling, mentoring."

Rewards for good behavior are heaped on through fun programs and celebration days. Students are constantly recognized with their pictures on a wall in the auditorium.

"The first year we implemented it, we suspended 22. Since then, we've suspended three students each consecutive year," Bishop says.

PBIS will first be rolled out in Jackson middle schools. The program should be in all Jackson schools by July 2013.

Thursday, October 29, 2009

MS: Student files suit over paddling; 2nd such suit against Leflore County Schools

October 23, 2009

http://www.sunherald.com/185/story/1694972.html

GREENWOOD, Miss. -- A school district in Leflore County has been hit with a lawsuit from a student alleging injuries from a paddling.

An 11-year-old is seeking $500,000 from the Greenwood Public School District in a suit filed in Leflore County Circuit Court.

The child's attorney said photographs show deep bruising on the then-10-year-old's buttocks and that he also suffered possible kidney damage.

Phone calls by The Greenwood Commonwealth for comment to Superintendent Margie Pulley and the schools' attorney, Richard Oakes, were not returned.

Last month, the guardian of a 6-year-old kindergartner filed a $500,000 lawsuit against the Leflore County School District for alleged paddlings.

Information from: The Greenwood Commonwealth, http://www.gwcommonwealth.com

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

ND: West Fargo School District to change corporal punishment policy

After West Fargo teacher Mavis Tjon was fired, she vowed to seek protection for other teachers.
By: Kelly Smith, INFORUM
October 27, 2009


After West Fargo teacher Mavis Tjon was fired, she vowed to seek protection for other teachers.

Now, she said, teachers have that protection.

The West Fargo School District is changing its corporal punishment policy to follow state legislation passed because of Tjon’s firing.

“I feel like the job that I started when I said ‘something good can come from this’ is done,” she said Monday. “And I also feel that it really does vindicate me in terms of saying that I was not treated fairly.”

On Monday, West Fargo School Board members reviewed changes to the district’s longstanding policy and expect to approve the revised policy on Nov. 9.

After she was fired in 2006, Tjon argued the district’s policy contained gaps that affected teachers.

She lobbied for a change in state law and several North Dakota legislators took up her case, sponsoring changes in legislation.

In March, the Legislature approved changes that require uniform disciplinary policies across schools and prohibit corporal punishment policies that are stricter than state law. When she was dismissed, Tjon taught in three West Fargo schools.

“There was a lot of support out there,” Tjon said. “I think that verifies what I was saying, that this needed to change.”

The district’s former policy, last revised in 1990, contained four sentences defining corporal punishment as “physical pain inflicted on a student.” The district allowed each school to develop its own disciplinary policies.

The district’s new page-long policy defines corporal punishment as “willful infliction of pain on a student,” and requires identical disciplinary policies, procedures and guidelines across all schools.

“It tries to standardize how we deal with student conduct at a higher level,” said Robin Hill, the district’s human resources director.

Tjon, who taught music for 25 years, was fired for violating the district’s corporal punishment policy after she said she tapped a boy on the head to get his attention.

Now, the 66-year-old said she finds solace in the new district policy.

“I was angry at the very beginning but … I really let go of that,” she said.

She also hopes the changes in policy will ensure teachers are treated more fairly if incidents like hers happen again.

“I wish it hadn’t had to take legislation to change their policies,” she said. “I really hope they’ll be more reasonable in the future.”

WI: Teacher accused of hitting student to appear in court

October 26, 2009

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

RACINE - A former special education teacher accused of hitting an autistic student will make her initial appearance in court this week, four months after the boy's mother made the allegations.

Rebecca F. Pranghofer, who was terminated by the Racine Unified School District earlier this month, is charged with two counts of violating the state's corporal punishment law for allegedly slapping the 12-year-old during a field trip to Downtown Racine in June.

Pranghofer is not facing criminal charges, according to the Racine County District Attorney's office. The state forfeiture action is a civil matter, like a speeding ticket, according to District Attorney Mike Nieskes.

Any penalty would not include any jail time, Nieskes said, but could include a fine. Pranghofer will appear in court Friday morning.

"The people who appear we sometimes negotiate a resolution with. If they don't show, they're forfeited," Nieskes said.

Unified officials conducted a separate investigation into the allegations and held an internal hearing involving Pranghofer, district and union officials.

The Unified School Board on Oct. 6 officially fired Pranghofer based on the recommendations from the internal hearing, according to a district spokesman.

District officials in June had placed Pranghofer on paid administrative leave from Jerstad-Agerholm Middle School, 3601 LaSalle St., after the student's mother filed charges against her.

Pranghofer had been a special education teacher at the school since 2003. She had worked in the district since 1987, according to district officials.

In addition to autism, the student is mostly non-verbal, can be aggressive and needs a one-on-one assistant. He also struggles with a number of other health issues.

At the time of the alleged incident, his mother filed a police report after meeting with school officials about the allegations.

At the time of the incident, the mother said an assistant teacher in the classroom, one of four teachers who attended the field trip, had called district officials to report that he witnessed the teacher slap the child on the face.

The mother said she heard about the alleged incident from her other son who also attended the school.

State law prohibits any kind of corporal punishment, which, according to the state's definition, includes, but is not limited to, paddling, slapping or prolonged maintenance of physically painful positions when used as a means of discipline.

In August, the state Department of Public Instruction launched an investigation into the status of Pranghofer's teaching license, according to an agency spokesman.

The investigation is ongoing and could result in the state revoking Pranghofer's teaching license.